Montval de Cuevas v. López Hermanos, S. en C.

The first, third, and sixth grounds of appeal are that the district court erred in finding that the injury received by plaintiff was caused by the entanglement of her feet in a piece of wire from defendant’s factory; in finding that defendant was guilty of negligence; and in deciding the conflict of evidence in favor of plaintiff. A reading of the brief and of the stenographic record has convinced us that none of these three grounds is tenable.

The second ground of appeal is that the district court erred in finding that the piece of wire in question had been negligently thrown into the street…