Legal Opinion

Brittain v. Farrington

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1925No. 16673. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Appellants filed a bill in the circuit court of Pike county seeking partition of two tracts of land, one of forty acres and the other of slightly less than seven acres. They set out in the bill that they are the heirs-at-law of John Brittain, who during his lifetime was the owner of seven tracts of land of forty acres each. He died in 1878, leaving a last will and testament. By the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth clauses of his will he devised in each a specifically described forty acres of land and a one-sixth part of another forty acres to five of his children and his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fifer v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Kohtz v. EldredIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Becker v. BeckerIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Miller v. WickIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Rickman v. MeierIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cahill v. MichaelIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Olson v. RossetterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  3. Scott v. CrumbaughIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Williams v. FultonIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Barnard v. LinekinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API