Goodnight v. Curry
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action contesting a purported will of William Goodnight. They contend that due to illness including a stroke, and advancing age, he did not have testamentary capacity at the time the document was signed and that it was executed as a result of undue influence. The trial court, finding that the decedent had testamentary capacity at the time he signed the will and that it was not executed due to undue influence, declared the contested will valid.
Plaintiffs contend that the court’s judgment “was against the weight of the evidence”: (1) “because there was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Lytle v. PageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matthews v. TurnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Sweeney v. EatonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Maurath v. SicklesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Looney v. Estate of EshlemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Rhodes v. BlairMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re Gene Wild Revocable TrustMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Carroll v. KnottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Fountain v. SchlankerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.