Legal Opinion

People v. Jones

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1963No. Crim. 3439PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DYKE, J. *

Appellant was charged with forcible rape, tried to a jury and convicted. He appeals from the judgment. The prosecutrix lived near where the appellant resided. About 1:30 a.m. on August 4, 1962, she was awakened by a young Negro man who, covering her mouth with one hand while he held a knife to her throat with the other, proceeded to rape her. The sole contention on appeal is that the identification of appellant as the rapist is legally insufficient. We find the contention without merit.

The strength or weakness of identification is a matter solely within the province of the jury.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. FinkelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. People v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. People v. AustinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. LivingstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. People v. FranklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. HarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. Edwards CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API