Legal Opinion

Seitz v. Department of Fire

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 1976Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs on opinion at Trial and Special Term, Donovan, J. Memorandum: We add that the workmen’s compensation cases relied upon by respondent are all distinguishable from the case at bar. A defendant liable for an injury runs the risk that the person whom he injures may be in such condition that the injury will be far more serious than had such person been strong and without a pre-existing condition which the accident aggravates (Poplar v Bourjois, Inc., 298 NY 62, 67-78; MacIver v Lyon, 43 AD2d 806, 807). (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga Special Term—article…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Poplar v. Bourjois, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. MacIver v. LyonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API