Legal Opinion

D'Amico v. Nuzzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 1993Published

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the nonparty appellant Sulsky & Haber, P. C., appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), entered September 9, 1991, as directed a hearing on the motion of the nonparty respondent David B. Jacobs to vacate a stipulation of settlement in the underlying action.

*762Ordered that on the court’s own motion, the appellant’s notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see, CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Teitelbaum Holdings, Ltd. v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Coyle v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API