Stein v. Dahm
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from tbe Chancery Court of Mobile. Heard before the Hon. ¥m. H. Tayloe.
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, C.-J.
It is assigned as error that the chancellor, after first granting relief to complainant, entertained defendant’s petition and granted him a rehearing. The first decree was rendered in vacation, under Rule 80 of Chancery Practice. — Code of 1886, p. 825. The concluding clause of that rule is in the following language: “When the decree is rendered in vacation, either party may apply for a rehearing by the second day of the next ensuing term of said court.” The application in this case was made “by the second day of the next ensuing term of said court,” and the chancellor committed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Corning v. GouldNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Harrell v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Ball v. Farley, Spear & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- King v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Scott v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
- Cox v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Zaner v. ThrowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.