Legal Opinion
Wackerbarth v. Weisman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 17, 1940No. 32,388PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hilton, Justice.
Appeal from an order of the district court for Hennepin county discharging two corporate garnishees.
Plaintiffs sued in the district court of this state upon a judgment procured against defendant in California. Ancillary to the main action, a garnishment proceeding was started against certain corporations, including the Gateway’ Holding Company and the William Weisman Holding Company. Defendant and these particular garnishees were represented by the same attorneys at the disclosure.
Mr. Levitt, disclosing for the Gateway Holding Company, was asked:
Q. “And as of that time [July…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holland v. Duluth Iron Mining & Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Galbraith v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Puget Sound National Bank v. MatherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Marin v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Kidd v. McCueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Katun Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation v. Terence Michael Clarke, a Florida CitizenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Kitzer v. Phalen Park State Bank of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Sprinkler Warehouse, Inc. v. Systematic Rain, Inc., d/b/a GPLAWN.comSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Sprinkler Warehouse, Inc. v. Systematic Rain, Inc., d/b/a GPLAWN.comCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Katun Corp. v. Terence ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.