Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Smith v. Ross

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1906No. 5988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court December 12, 1905, for a writ of mandate to the state land commissioner to- compel the reinstatement of a lease of public lands.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

— This is an original application made to1 this court for a writ of mandamus to- compel the defendant, as *440State Land Commissioner, to reinstate a certain lease of tide lands, and accept the rent due thereon.

The relator alleges that on November 1, 1899, the state of Washington, by and through its then duly qualified and acting commissioner of public lauds, executed and delivered to one V. Hugo Smith, the husband of relator, lease No. 311, for the period of thirty years, for certain tide lauds of the first class in Seattle, King county, Washington; that on November 1, 1899, said V. Hugo Smith…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SullenbergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. State ex rel. Bussell v. CallvertWashington Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fluckiger v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Regan v. School District No. 25Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Prichard v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API