Legal Opinion

Henican v. Carr

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 14, 1986No. CA-3955Published

1Opinion of the Court

BYRNES, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Civil District Court in which appellant, the law firm of Hennican James & Cleveland, sued Hibernia National Bank (Hibernia) for attorney fees. Appellant contends that in accord with the equitable principle of nego-tiorum gestio, CCP Art. 2292 et seq, Hibernia should pay these fees since they benefited from a concursus proceeding which appellant conducted on behalf of its client. The trial court refused to apply the article and held that a court should not resort to a principle of equity as long as the positive law is not silent on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thurman v. Star Electric Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. Succession of GuichardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  3. Louisiana State Mineral Board v. AlbaradoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  4. New York Life Ins. v. DorsettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. Broussard, Broussard & M., Ltd. v. STATE A. &. CU CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API