Legal Opinion

In re Hurlbutt, Hatch & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 9, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Petition for Revision of Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner was a member of the firm of Hurlbutt, Hatch & Co., bankrupts. Henry B. Ketcham, trustee in bankruptcy of said firm, claimed that a seat in the New York Stock Exchange, standing in the name of said Hatch, was copartnership property, worth $68,000, which passed to the trustee and could be sold by him, yet that, owing to the custom and rules of the stock exchange, it could not be advantageously sold so as to be available for the satisfaction of the claims of the firm’s creditors, unless its sale should be requested by Hatch, but that, if he would execute…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sparhawk v. YerkesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Hyde v. WoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Ager v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Page v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Stephens v. CadySupreme Court of the United States · 1853

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Watson Bros. Transp. Co. v. JaffaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  2. In Re AmyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  3. In re StringerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  4. In re WrightDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1907
  5. Kresel v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API