Legal Opinion
TORO
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1980No. ID 2784PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #2784 MATTER OF TORO In Deportation Proceedings A-20704042 Decided by Board February 27, 1980 (1) To be admissible in deportation proceedings, evidence must be probative and its use fundamentally fair so as to not deprive respondents of due process of law. (2) The fact that given evidence resulted from a search and seizure in violation of fourth amendment rights will not of necessity result in a finding that use of the evidence is fundamentally unfair. (3) The circumstances surrounding an arrest and interrogation may In some cases render evidence inadmissible under the due…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Illinois Migrant Council, Etc. v. Alva L. Pilliod, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Ramon Trias--Hernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- CHOULIARISBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1977
- Marcelino Martin-Mendoza v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jacob Ikperha Orhorhaghe v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Cinapian v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Werquely Jeanini Almeida-Amaral v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- BARCENASBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- Kandamar v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.