Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Knox's Executors

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 16, 1833PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Chancery,

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Underwood

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Colonel Knox, as patentee, owned two tracts of land in the state of Ohio — one of two thousand, the other of seven hundred acres. He was entitled to one thousand six hundred twenty eight acres and two thirds, in land warrants, as a balance due him for bis services in the revolutionary army. He employed Taylor, the plaintiff in error, to take care of the two tracts, to pay taxes on them, and on other lands which he owned in Ohio. *392And likewise, to obtain land warrants for the- balance due him, as an officer of the Virginia continental line. He…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dutton v. . WillnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Eaton v. TruesdailMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Taylor v. Knox's ExecutorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837
  4. Dodge v. PerkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1830
  5. Dutton v. WillnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API