Legal Opinion

Luten v. MacAfee

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 8, 1913No. 85Published

In Equity. Suit by Daniel B. Luten against D. J. MacAfee and S. B. MacAfee.

1Opinion of the Court

WITMER, District Judge.

This is a suit brought by Daniel B. Luten against D. J. MacAfee and S. B. MacAfee, doing business under the name and style of the MacAfee Concrete Company, under letters patent Nos. 818,386, 853,202, and 853,203, taken out and owned by Daniel B. Luten, the complainant, upon his invention for reinforcing, by iron and steel rods, concrete arch bridge structures;

The inventions embodied in these patents and covered by the claims thereof were used by the defendants in the construction of a concrete bridge, erected by the defendants for the county commissioners in the fall of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blakey v. National Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1899
  2. Sprague Electric Railway & Motor Co. v. Nassau Electric R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
  3. Jordan v. DobsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1870
  4. Pelzer v. City of BinghamtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
  5. American Graphophone Co. v. Talking-Machine Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API