Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State ex rel. Macy v. Bragg

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 27, 2000No. PR-2000-1122Published

1Concurrence

LILE, Judge:

Specially Concurring:

T1 The State's Application to Assume Original Jurisdiction and Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition is properly before this Court under the provisions of the Okla homa Constitution1 and the rules of this Court.2 Rule 10.6 does not limit-nor should *509it Himit-availability of the Writ of Prohibition to those cases where the trial court does not have jurisdiction of the parties or the subject matter of the controversy in issue. We have held in numerous cases that the State of Oklahoma is entitled to seek an extraordinary writ of Prohibition or Mandamus from…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. State Ex Rel. Haskell v. HustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Allen v. District Court of Washington CountyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. State Ex Rel. Burford v. SullivanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API