Legal Opinion

Wynn v. Wynn

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1928No. 441PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFunk, J.

“It is contended that the order and judgment was given for the defendant when the same should have been given for plaintiff; that it is contrary to law, and that the court erred in overruling the motion for new trial.

It appears from the record that the father owns a comfortable home, and there is evidence to the effect that this son was always welcome in that home, where a room was provided for him; and for aught that appears in this record, the father has ever been ready and willing to support his son in the home whenever he desired to be there.

The record further discloses that this minor…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Calogeras v. CalogerasCuyahoga County Juvenile Court · 1959
  2. Robrock v. RobrockOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Ford v. FordOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Campbell v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Mitchell v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API