Legal Opinion

State v. Hindenach

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 29, 1998No. 92880PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Hindenach v. State, 708 So.2d 336 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), wherein the district court certified conflict with Mays v. State, 693 So.2d 52 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We have since approved the district court decision in Mays. See Mays v. State, 717 So.2d 515, 23 Fla. L. Weekly S387 (Fla.1998) (holding that under section 921.001(5), Florida Statutes (1995), if the “true” recommended guidelines sentence exceeds the statutory maximum, the guidelines sentence must be imposed). Accordingly, we quash Hindenach,1

It is so…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mays v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  2. Mays v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Hindenach v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hindenach v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API