State v. Hindenach
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, Justice.
We have for review Hindenach v. State, 708 So.2d 336 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), wherein the district court certified conflict with Mays v. State, 693 So.2d 52 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
We have since approved the district court decision in Mays. See Mays v. State, 717 So.2d 515, 23 Fla. L. Weekly S387 (Fla.1998) (holding that under section 921.001(5), Florida Statutes (1995), if the “true” recommended guidelines sentence exceeds the statutory maximum, the guidelines sentence must be imposed). Accordingly, we quash Hindenach,1
It is so…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mays v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Mays v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Hindenach v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hindenach v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002