Legal Opinion

Quirk v. Data Terminal Systems, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 25, 1985PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

A judge of the Superior Court granted the defendant’s motion to correct an alleged clerical error in an arbitration award, and confirmed the award as corrected. The plaintiffs appealed to the Appeals Court, which reversed and dismissed the motion to correct the award because it was made more than thirty days after the award was filed. Quirk v. Data Terminal Syss., 18 Mass. App. Ct. 1104(1984). SeeG. L. c. 251, § 13. We granted further appellate review to consider the sole issue raised on appeal: whether the judge erred under G. L. c. 251, § 13, in correcting the arbitration award where the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local Union No. 135 v. Jefferson Trucking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  2. Trustees of Boston & Maine Corp. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Pereira v. New England LNG Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. Quirk v. Data Terminal Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Bernstein v. Gramercy Mills, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marino v. TagarisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Loche v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  3. Ciampa v. Chubb Group of Insurance CompaniesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  4. Reynolds v. WhitmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  5. Karbowski v. Resnic, Beauregard, Waite & DriscollMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API