Legal Opinion

Armour Fertilizer Works v. Zills

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 18, 1937No. 8 Div. 831PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is a bill in equity, filed by appellant to enforce an alleged vendor’s lien.

McNair was the owner of the land and sold and conveyed it to appellee, Zills, for a consideration of $950, recited in the deed to be fully paid. It was not in fact all paid, but was subject to an agreement between the parties, whereby the purchaser assumed a mortgage of approximately $500, and transferred certain securities which wer.e accepted as cash, and were paid later, and gave his note for a balance of $156, the subject of this suit.

The note was a negotiable instrument and made no reference…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coster's Ex'rs v. Bank of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  2. Tedder v. SteeleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Hart v. AdlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Fortson v. BishopSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Campbell v. GoldthwaiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DeVenney v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. Ex Rel. Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, Inc. v. Carmichael (In Re Carmichael)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Hardy v. GissendanerDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API