Armour Fertilizer Works v. Zills
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This is a bill in equity, filed by appellant to enforce an alleged vendor’s lien.
McNair was the owner of the land and sold and conveyed it to appellee, Zills, for a consideration of $950, recited in the deed to be fully paid. It was not in fact all paid, but was subject to an agreement between the parties, whereby the purchaser assumed a mortgage of approximately $500, and transferred certain securities which wer.e accepted as cash, and were paid later, and gave his note for a balance of $156, the subject of this suit.
The note was a negotiable instrument and made no reference…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coster's Ex'rs v. Bank of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- Tedder v. SteeleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Hart v. AdlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Fortson v. BishopSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Campbell v. GoldthwaiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DeVenney v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. Ex Rel. Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, Inc. v. Carmichael (In Re Carmichael)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Hardy v. GissendanerDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1974