Legal Opinion
Ulster Savings Bank v. Freytes
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 2015PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Thomas F. Whelan, J.
Ordered that the motion (No. 002) by defendant Freytes for an order compelling defendant “JPMorgan Chase Bank to execute a subordinating agreement so that co-defendant Freytes modification can proceed” is considered under CPLR 3408 and is denied.
The plaintiff commenced this action to foreclose the lien of consolidated mortgage given by defendant Freytes to the plaintiff on December 21, 2001. On that date, the plaintiff loaned defendant Freytes the sum of $46,000 as evidenced by a mortgage note that was secured by a mortgage of the same date. Also…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Woodson v. Mendon Leasing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- First National Stores, Inc. v. Yellowstone Shopping Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Jo Ann Homes at Bellmore, Inc. v. DworetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Graf v. Hope Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Noyes v. . AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Harvest Sherwood Food Distributors, Inc., et al. v. Blakemore Investments LLC, Milwaukee Investments LP; Hamilton Meat, LLC, Harvest Meat Company, Inc., Harvest Sherwood Food Distributors, Inc., Sherwood Food Distributors, L.L.C., Western Boxed MeatUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2025