Mathis v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
OWEN, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of robbery and sentenced to life imprisonment. Because the prosecutor, during closing argument to the jury, directly or indirectly commented upon the failure of the defendant to testify, the judgment and sentence must be reversed and this cause remanded for a new trial.
After appellant was arrested and charged with the crime, he was properly warned of his constitutional rights and knowingly and voluntarily signed a written waiver thereof. Some 14 hours later, while still in custody, he voluntarily submitted to interrogation in the course of which he made…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
- Trafficante v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
- Way v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Price v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Childers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- State v. MathisSupreme Court of Florida · 1973