Legal Opinion

Blaylock v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 1953No. 27,457PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant was tried, convicted and assessed a fine of $250 for possessing wine and beer for the purpose of sale' in a dry area.

*347No statement of facts is found in the record.

There is one formal bill of exception, the proposition presented in appellant’s brief thereunder being “The trial court committed reversible error in this cause by permitting the county attorney to amend the complaint and information after both the State of Texas and the defendant had announced ready for trial and after the jury had been selected and sworn, as shown by appellant’s Bill of Exception No. 1.”

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Givens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Blackman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Lazenberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Gayton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Gaytan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Toler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Hess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Tealer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Burrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Burrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API