Legal Opinion

Bechtel v. Mostrom

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 24, 1932No. 41501PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

The facts upon which the cases were tried and submitted in the district court are stipulated and appellee has neither appeared nor filed brief and argument in the cases. The drainage districts are identified and described in the record as Drainage District No. 46 and Drainage District No. 48. The bonds issued by Drainage District No. 46, serially numbered from 1 to 74, both inclusive, aggregated $70,400. The bonds issued by District No. 48, serially numbered from 1 to 66, both inclusive, aggregated $65,100. All of the bonds issued by the respective districts prior to May 1st, 1930, have been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whitney v. EichnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. White v. GutshallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Teget v. LambachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  2. Shaw, McDermott & Sparks, Inc. v. Town of DanburySupreme Court of Iowa · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API