Legal Opinion

Shannon v. Potter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 13, 1921No. 10276PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Cotton County; Cham Jones, Judge. Action by Bertie Emma Potter, now Renner, and Bertha Edna Hauser against Isaac E. Shannon and wife to quiet title. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMeNEILL, J.

The defendants in error commenced this action against Isaac E. Shannon and Burnie Shannon, husband and wife, to quiet title to 160 acres of land in Cotton county. The petition alleged defendants in error had purchased the land from Isaac E. Shannon and were in possession and had been for seven years. The plaintiffs in error. Isaac E. Shannon and Burnie E. Shannon, answered, alleging that at the time of the execution of the deed by Isaac E. Shannon to defendn"ts in error the land was occupied bv Isaac E. Shannon and Burnie E Shannon as their homestead, and that Burnie E. Shannon did not join…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whelan v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Kelly v. MosbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Standard Savings Loan Association v. ActonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Montgomery v. WiseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Bishoff v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Standard Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ActonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Fetterman v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API