Legal Opinion

Foster v. Bullock

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1935No. 25536. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

In this action, the plaintiff sought to restrain the defendants from trespassing upon what he alleged to be a private roadway upon his premises, and asked damages resulting from work done upon the roadway by the defendant county and its officers.

In Ms complaint, the plaintiff alleged that he had constructed a private driveway leading from a county Mghway to his residence; that, in his absence, the defendants Bullock and Crandall confederated with the defendant Benig, road supervisor of the northern commissioner’s district of King county, of which district the defendant John C. Stevenson was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. City of Seattle v. SmithersWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Mason County v. McReavyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Thorsteinson v. LargaudWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State v. RixieWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Purvis v. BuseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Bryan Kelley And Dorre Don Llc v. Beverly L. TondaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  3. Primark, Inc. v. Burien Gardens AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  4. King County v. HagenWashington Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API