Legal Opinion

State v. Wein

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 27, 2017No. 1 CA-SA 16-0159PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Judge:

¶ 1 This special action arises out of the superior court’s refusal to consider victims’ impact statements proffered by the state during a bond release hearing. The court ruled that, at a hearing to determine whether a defendant was bondable, it would not consider the impact statements without giving the defense an opportunity to cross-examine the victims at the hearing. The state petitioned this court. For the following reasons, we accept jurisdiction and grant relief.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 In January 2016, Real Party in Interest, Phillip Ray Sisco (Sisco),…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Twin City Fire Insurance v. BurkeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Thomas v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Simpson v. Miller ex rel. County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. CowlesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. QuijadaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  2. J v. v. Hon blair/morrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023
  3. State of Arizona v. Jesus Ismael RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025
  4. State v. SneeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. Z.W. v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API