State v. Wein
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Judge:
¶ 1 This special action arises out of the superior court’s refusal to consider victims’ impact statements proffered by the state during a bond release hearing. The court ruled that, at a hearing to determine whether a defendant was bondable, it would not consider the impact statements without giving the defense an opportunity to cross-examine the victims at the hearing. The state petitioned this court. For the following reasons, we accept jurisdiction and grant relief.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 In January 2016, Real Party in Interest, Phillip Ray Sisco (Sisco),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Twin City Fire Insurance v. BurkeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Thomas v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Simpson v. Miller ex rel. County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. CowlesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. QuijadaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- J v. v. Hon blair/morrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023
- State of Arizona v. Jesus Ismael RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025
- State v. SneeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Z.W. v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018