Legal Opinion · Dissent
Combined Communications Corporation Nashville Banner Publishing Company, Cross-Appellees v. United States Postal Service, Cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 15, 1989No. 88-5817, 88-5819Published
1DissentKrupansky, Circuit Judge
This action was properly initiated before the Postal Rate Commission (Commission) by the Combined Communication Corp. and the Nashville Banner Publishing Co. (plaintiffs), as aggrieved parties, pursuant to the Congressional mandate expressed in 39 U.S.C. § 3662 of the Postal Reorganization Act of 19701 (the Act), by filing a complaint wherein they asserted that the Postal Service (Service) was charging them rates which did not conform to the policies set out in the Act and that they were not receiving postal service in accordance with its policies, as a result of which, their “Plus”…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whitney National Bank in Jefferson Parish v. Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United Parcel Service, Inc., a New York Corporation, and United Parcel Service, Inc., and Ohio Corporation v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.