Legal Opinion

Posner v. Flink

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 15, 1964No. 64-140PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TILLMAN PEARSON, Judge.

The defendant, Victor Posner, has appealed and the plaintiff, Richard S. Flink, has joined in the appeal from a final decree which directs an accounting by defendant Posner on three business ventures between them, and provides that the accounting shall be separate for each transaction.1

In addition, the decree finds that the plaintiff Flink is indebted to the defendant Posner in the sum of $21,975.00 which is 75% of a $29,300 profit Flink received in connection with the leasing of the “Imperial Bowl”.

The findings of fact upon which the decree is based are as follows:

“A.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Connelly v. Special Road & Bridge District No. 5Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Jefferson Insurance Company v. FischerSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  3. Halie v. WickershamSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Liza Danielle, Inc. v. Jamko, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Spurrier v. United BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. D'Amato v. D'AmatoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Vining v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Rosa Bros. v. SchlossmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API