Bonomonte v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. Even assuming, as plaintiff alleges, that the City of New York owed plaintiff a duty and breached that duty, the City was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint because it established, as a matter of law, that any negligence on its part was not a proximate cause of plaintiff’s injuries (see Sheehan v City of New York, 40 NY2d 496, 503 [1976]).
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sheehan v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by7 opinions
- Williams v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Wood v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Vohra v. Queen Anne Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Butbul v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Gillern v. MahoneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.