Legal Opinion

Cantwell v. Herring.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 23, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Civil Action by W. L. Cantwell against Doane Herring, heard by Judge J. W. Bowman, at Spring Term, 1900, of WilsoN Superior Court. Erom order permitting defendant to amend verification to his answer, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

This was a civil action based on a contract coming on to be heard upon the complaint and answer. The plaintiff moved for judgment upon the sworn complaint, alleging that the verification of the answer was insufficient. The Court held with the plaintiff that the verification of the answer was not sufficient, whereupon the defendant asked leave to amend such verification. Such leave was granted over tbe objection of tbe plaintiff. On motion of tbe defendant, tbe Court tlion allowed an amended answer to be filed, tbe plaintiff again objecting. Tbe plaintiff assigns as error (1) tbe refusal of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gilchrist v. . KitchenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  2. Griffin v. Asheville Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  3. Phifer v. Travellers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Mallard v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  5. Phifer v. Travellers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Cole v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. Payne v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  4. Best v. LancasterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API