Legal Opinion

Cooper & Sons v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 23, 1913No. 4922, 4997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Complaint; from city court of Madison — Judge Anderson.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

This ease is controlled by the ruling of the Supreme Court in the case of Hilt v. Young, 116 Ga. 708 (43 S. E. 76). The plaintiff in ihe lower court has filed 'a cross-bill of exceptions, the ruling upon which will control the decision on both writs *492of error. From the cross-bill it appears that the motion for- a new trial was not filed at the term at which the rule nisi was granted, and indeed was not filed until the day the judgment was rendered overruling the defendant’s motion for a new trial. Upon the hearing of the motion for a new trial, the plaintiff’s counsel made a motion to dismiss…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hilt v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. FlemisterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Cook v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peavy v. PeavySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API