Heyward v. Williams
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Aldrich, J., Beaufort, Motion of plaiutiff for leave to amend complaint in case of A. H. Heyward against C. A. Williams et al. Motion granted. Defendants, C. A. Williams and A. S. Williams, appeal. cites: Code, 194; 31 S. C., 199; 43 S. C., 318; 18 S. C., 305; 26 S. C., 474; 31 S. C., 588. cites: 9 S. C., 330; 13 S. C., 23; 38 N. Y., 206; 16 S. C., 358; 2 S. E. R., 501; 14 S. C., 223; 17 S. E. R., 21; 10 S. E. R., 545; 12 lb., 564; 14 lb., 622; 2 lb., 483.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Jones.
This is an appeal from an order of *565Judge Aldrich allowing plaintiffs to serve amended copies of the complaint on certain of the defendants, allowing said defendants twenty days after service thereof within which to answer, and allowing plaintiffs twenty days after service of said answer in which to reply to any matter set up by way of counter-claim. The Circuit Judge found the facts as follows: “Counsel for plaintiff prepared a complaint, endorsed original, for the foreclosure of a mortgage of real estate. The words ‘after maturity’…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Sentell v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Lee v. StorferSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Coker v. Monaghan MillsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1902