Legal Opinion

Opinion of the Justices

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 9, 2015No. 2015-171PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*540On March 18, 2015, the clerk of the New Hampshire House of Representatives (House) notified the chief justice and the associate justices of the supreme court that, on March 11, 2015, the House had adopted a request for an opinion of the justices regarding House Bill (HB) 112, an act relative to domicile for voting purposes. The House has requested that the justices give their opinion upon the following questions of law:

“1) Does HB 112 violate Part I, Article 11 of the New Hampshire State Constitution?

2) Does HB 112 violate any other provisions of the United States or the New Hampshire…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Oscar Cruz v. MelecioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  3. Bill Duncan & a. v. State of New Hampshire & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  4. Akins v. Secretary of StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices (Definition of Resident and Residence)Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
  2. Request for an Opinion of the Justices (Quorum under Part II, Article 20)Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API