Legal Opinion

Brown v. Vocelle

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 9, 1994No. 94-0180PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition for writ of mandamus filed by the pro se prisoner is denied. Petitioner requests that this court order the lower court to rule on a motion to transcribe various parts of the criminal proceeding which resulted in his conviction and sentence. The petition does not include a copy of the motion nor does it state that he has filed any motion for post-conviction relief for which the transcripts are necessary, which is a prerequisite to the trial court’s consideration of any motion for transcription. See Carr v. State, 495 So.2d 282 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). Instead the petitioner simply…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carr v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Cassoday v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  3. Campbell v. State Ex Rel. GarrettSupreme Court of Florida · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goggins v. Pinellas County, Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial CircuitDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Brown v. Public Defender's Office for the Fourth Judicial CircuitDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API