Legal Opinion

Putnam, Hooker & Co. v. Loeb

Franklin Circuit Court

Decided January 15, 1887Published

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin county.

1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.

This is a proceeding in error to reverse an order made by the court of common pleas in the distribution of a fund between the plaintiffs in error and the defendants in error, who are creditors attaching certain goods.

The record shows that on April 15, 1884, the plaintiffs in error brought suit against one George W. Clay, upon an account for goods sold and delivered to him, as averred in the petition, at his request, “by the description of G. W. Clay & Bro.”

The petition then averring that no part of the account is due, proceeds as follows: “The defendant G. W. Clay has sold, conveyed, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Constable & Co. v. WhiteOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1854
  2. Smead v. ChrisfieldOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1855

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API