Legal Opinion

Stamper v. Hopkins

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed March 11, 1924:

Owen, J.

Sub. (2), sec. 1223, Stats., authorizes town boards of supervisors “to provide machinery, implements, stone, gravel and other material on such terms as may seem proper, and hire such machinery, laborers and animals as may be required to make, build, pave and repair highways and bridges.” In Indiana R. M. Co. v. Lake, 149 Wis. 541, 136 N. W. 178, it was held that this statutory provision authorizes the town board to purchase machinery only when the electors have made provision to meet the expenditure and have in fact or in effect…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Frederick v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. First Wisconsin National Bank v. Town of CatawbaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Cawker v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. McGowan v. PaulWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Babcock v. City of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sheboygan County v. TelgenerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Murphy v. PaullWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API