Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Delacruz

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 16, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

A jury found the defendant guilty on two indictments charging armed assault with intent to rob based on evidence of his involvement, together with two accomplices, in the planning and execution of a robbery, on January 22, 2000. The defendant appealed from his convictions, contending, insofar as relevant here, that the prosecutor engaged in misconduct in his closing argument by improperly emphasizing and bolstering the credibility of one of the Commonwealth’s witnesses (James Forte, one of the accomplices) by reading verbatim portions of Forte’s testimony as transcribed at trial, *693and by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KozecMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Sherrod v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. MoralesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. RodriguezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. BurtsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. WaiteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API