Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Taylor

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1906No. 2,187PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Error to the United States Court of Appeals in the Indian Territory.

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DEVANTER, Circuit Judge.. The questions presented in this case arise under such of the statutes of Arkansas, published in Mansf. Dig. of .1884, as have been extended over and put in force in the Indian Territory by Congress (Act May 2, 1890, 26 Stat. 94, c. 182, § 31), and are: (1) Is Ellen Taylor entitled, under Mansf. Dig. § 2591 (Ind. T. Ann. St. 1899, § 1879) to one-third of the personal estate of her deceased husband, George W. Taylor? (2) Is she entitled to receive out of said estate the allowances named in Mansf. Dig. §§ 62, 63 (Ind. T. Ann. St. 1899, §§ 119, 120). The trial court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  2. Young v. HerdicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
  3. Speidel's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  4. In re Estate of TaylorCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Krumenacker v. AndisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  2. In Re Metcalf's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Davis v. Estate of DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  4. United States v. McCartyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  5. Davis v. Estate of DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API