Legal Opinion
Club Assistance Program, Inc. v. Zukerman
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 10, 1984No. 84 C 1699PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
On April 27, 1984 Jack Zukerman (“Zukerman”), William Feldstein, Jr. (“Feldstein”) and Murray Scheer (“Scheer”) moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 12(b)(2) to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) of Club Assistance Program, Inc. ("CAP”). Eight days later they moved under Rule 12(b)(3) for change of venue. For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order defendants’ Rule 12(b)(3) motion is denied, while their Rule 12(b)(2) motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Facts 1
Defendants are officers and directors of…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Rollins v. EllwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- David Caldwell, Etc. And James C. Harvey v. Palmetto State Savings Bank of South Carolina, Etc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Bally Export Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Balicar, Ltd., a Foreign Corporation, and Juliano Internacional S.A., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Fmc Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Victoria Varonos, Cross-Appellee v. Continental Illinois National Bank, Garnishee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Scott Turnock v. Arthur Cope, James Jones and George AuchterloineCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.