Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Huther

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 22, 1964Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The trial court in a series of erroneous rulings on the admissibility of evidence severely limited both parties in the trial of this action. The prior written statement made by defendant was clearly admissible and should have been received. The fact that the Trial Judge (in Ms own words) has a “phobia against things going in on what people say on other occasions” is immaterial. Admissibility of proof must be controlled by recognized rules of evidence and not the predilections of each individual Judge.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Huther, New York County Courts1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API