Legal Opinion
Bullard v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 29, 2025No. 3:24-cv-03714Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 LARISA BULLARD, et al., 10 Case No. 24-cv-03714-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO SEEK 12 RECONSIDERATION AND REQUEST COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP., et al., TO CERTIFY INTERLOCUTORY 13 APPEAL Defendants. 14 15 16 Plaintiff Larisa Bullard alleges in this putative class action that Kirkland “Signature Baby 17 Wipes, Fragrance Free,” which are manufactured by defendant Nice-Pak Products, Inc. and 18 marketed and sold by defendant Costco Wholesale Corp., are unfit for their intended use because 19 they contain…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 296). State of Arizona v. Ideal Basic Industries, State of Arizona v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, and Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corporation, Real Parties in Interest. State of Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.