Legal Opinion

In re Dooley

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for a writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.

This is a motion for a writ of mandamus to procure the reinstatement of petitioner in the position of stationary engineer in the bureau of sewers, department of public works, in the borough of Queens. Without reciting all the facts, it is sufficient to say that the right of the petitioner to reinstatement depends upon the determination of the question whether he was appointed to the position of stationary engineer in the Jamaica disposal plant as a distinct position, or whether he was appointed generally as a stationary engineer in the bureau of sewers or in the' department of public works,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Breckenridge v. ScannellNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Matter of Stutzbach v. . ColerNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Jones v. WillcoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Pratt v. PhelanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  5. In re GriffinNew York Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Davidson v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API