Legal Opinion

In re Submission of Controversy under Section 546 of Civil Practice Act between Haher & Hamilton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 15, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The county judge of Rockland county appointed a referee to examine the accounts of committees of certain incompetent persons. In confirming the report of the referee, the county judge, with reference to the estate of one of the incompetents, the assets of which amounted to less than $5,000, directed that the referee’s fee and expenses, stated in the order of confirmation, be paid by the county treasurer of Rockland county pursuant to the provisions of section 1379 of the Civil Practice Act. The county treasurer refused to pay the amounts and the controversy between the parties was submitted…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of LesterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API