Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Hanover Insurance & Velez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 1, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment (denominated order) of Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Toker, J.), entered April 29, 1993, which, after a hearing, denied petitioner’s application to stay uninsured motorist arbitration demanded by respondent Velez, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to petitioner’s arguments, respondent Liberty Mutual Insurance Company was not required to provide its insured, respondent Edwards, with 45 days notice of non-renewal, file such notice with the Department of Motor Vehicles, or notify Edwards of his right to appeal the termination of coverage.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Colonial Penn Insurance v. MartichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Badagliacca v. GEICO General InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API