Legal Opinion
CBM Collections, Inc. v. Ferreira
Montana Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 2005No. 04-680PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart
¶1 Fred Ferreira appeals from the District Court’s judgment affirming the Justice Court’s denial of his motion to set aside because the thirty-day deadline for filing an application for relief under Rule 22A, Montana Justice and City Court Rules of Civil Procedure (M.J.C.C.R.Civ.P.), had elapsed. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶2 The Justice Court entered a default judgment in the amount of $1635.33 plus interest for CBM Collections, Inc. (CBM), and against Ferriera. Sixty-four days later, CBM executed judgment against Ferreira. Fourteen days after that, Ferreira filed a Motion to Set Aside or Quash the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Western Life Indemnity Co. of Ill. v. RuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stanley v. LemireMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Boe v. Court Administrator for the Montana Judicial Branch of Personnel Plan & PoliciesMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Bugger v. McGoughMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Boe v. COURT ADM'R FOR THE MON. JUD. BRANCHMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- CBM Collections, Inc. v. FerreiraMontana Supreme Court · 2005