United States v. Thurston Paul Bell
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Chief Judge.
At issue is whether a permanent injunction barring defendant Thurston Paul Bell from promoting and selling unlawful tax advice is permissible under the First Amendment. We will affirm the injunction with modifications.
I
Thurston Paul Bell is a professional tax protester who ran a business and a website selling bogus strategies to clients endeavoring to avoid paying taxes. In the 1980s, he worked for Save-A-Patriot, an entity dedicated to the proposition that “American citizens are not liable for the income tax.” Bell later started his own organization,…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- McTernan v. City of York, Penn.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. North Hudson Regional Fire & RescueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Berg Chilling Systems, Inc. v. Hull Corporation Sp Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Meyer v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- United States v. ConcesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.