Legal Opinion

United States v. Thurston Paul Bell

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 12, 2005No. 04-1640PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCIRICA, Chief Judge.

At issue is whether a permanent injunction barring defendant Thurston Paul Bell from promoting and selling unlawful tax advice is permissible under the First Amendment. We will affirm the injunction with modifications.

I

Thurston Paul Bell is a professional tax protester who ran a business and a website selling bogus strategies to clients endeavoring to avoid paying taxes. In the 1980s, he worked for Save-A-Patriot, an entity dedicated to the proposition that “American citizens are not liable for the income tax.” Bell later started his own organization,…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. McTernan v. City of York, Penn.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. North Hudson Regional Fire & RescueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. Berg Chilling Systems, Inc. v. Hull Corporation Sp Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. Meyer v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. ConcesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API