Legal Opinion

State v. Lynch

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 21, 1946No. 3573PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Whether or not the testimony concerning the fact of the complaint by the child could be received before she testified need not be decided. The mere fact that she made a seasonable complaint is admissible, though hearsay, for either of two purposes: (1) to contradict the inference of the incredibility of the complainant’s testimony that might be drawn from her failure to complain seasonably of the assault, or (2) as bearing on the complainant’s state of mind with reference to consent to the assault. In the case of a child below the age of consent, the latter is immaterial. But even a prompt…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bennett v. BennettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
  2. State v. WargoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. State v. WoodardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. State v. BerrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. State v. MartineauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  5. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API