Legal Opinion

Lowrie v. Brennan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1937No. Docket No. 30, Calendar No. 39,659PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

I am unable to concur in the result reached by Mr. Justice Sharpe. In determining the effect of Act No. 146, Pub. Acts 1877 (1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 402) and Act No. 105, Pub. Acts 1913, as amended, particularly sections 7 and 10 thereof, the same being reenacted by Act No. 175, chap. 11, §§ 7, 10, Pub. Acts 1927 (3 Comp. Laws 1929, §§ 17377, 17380), Mr. Justice Sharpe applies the rule of interpretation found in 46 C. J. p. 965, which states:

“If the language of a statute specifying the term of office of an official is ambiguous, the interpretation which limits the term to the shortest time will…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. De Castro v. Board of Comm'rs of San JuanSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. de Castro v. Junta de Comisionados de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1942
  3. Haack v. BanishMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Haack v. BanishMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API