M.A.V. v. State

M.A.V., a juvenile, appeals the imposition of adult sanctions and restitution after he pleaded no contest to the charge of armed robbery.

We affirm the restitution order because M.A.V. failed to object to the state’s proof at the hearing and also failed to present evidence of his inability to pay. See Williams v. State, 591 So.2d 664 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

We reverse the order imposing adult sanctions because the trial court did not strictly comply with the supreme court’s decision in Troutman v. State, 630 So.2d 528 (Fla.1993), which was not issued at the time of sentencing in M.A.V.’s case. In…