Legal Opinion
Union Light, Heat & Power Co. v. City of Fort Thomas
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided June 25, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Sampson
Reversing.
The judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted enjoined the appellant gas company “from turning off, or in any manner interfering with the gas supply of the city of Fort Thomas, its inhabitants and consumers.” The correctness of that judgment is questioned by this appeal. Appellant company distributes and sells gas through its mains and pipes in the city of Fort Thomas to the municipality and other consumers. The franchise under which it began to operate was granted by the city in 1915 for a term of ten years. It expired by its. terms at…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- New York Ex Rel. New York & Queens Gas Co. v. McCallSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- City of Princeton v. Princeton Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Summerville v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Union Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Railroad Commission of Commonwealth of KentuckyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1926
- City of Covington v. Union Light, Heat & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Board of Education, Somerset v. Ky. Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- City of Ludlow v. Union Light, Heat & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.